Skip to content

Delhi HC permits a Vivo mobile distributor to operate a frozen bank account

  • by

The Delhi High Court has allowed a Vivo mobile distributor, M/S Grand Prospect International Communication Private Limited, to operate its frozen bank account. Justice Yashwant Varma allowed the distributor to operate its bank account after it was frozen by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in July 2022.

The HC has directed the company to maintain the credit balance as of the date of freezing of the bank account. The Court has also restrained the company from repatriating money abroad.

The bench also issued notice to the ED on the petition moved by the company. The Court directed ED to file an affidavit on the plea. The matter has been tagged with the other matter listed on September 20, 2022.

The bench said “In the meantime, and bearing in mind the interim directions which were passed on the aforesaid writ petition as well as the orders passed on the other writ petitions preferred by other dealers of Vivo Mobile, the Court provides in the interim that while the petitioner shall be permitted to operate the bank accounts which stand frozen pursuant to the order challenged, it shall ensure that a credit balance of Rs. 10,45,94,868.9/- is maintained at all times.”

The Court also directed that the petitioner furnish statements of accounts of all the bank accounts forming the subject matter of the freezing order every 48 hours to the ED.

The Court further restrained the petitioner from repatriating any proceeds which may come to be credited to the subject bank account outside the country until the next date of listing.

Senior advocate Dayan Krishnan on behalf of the petitioner argued that the petitioner is a distributor of Vivo mobile for the Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh. Its bank account was frozen on July 5 and 6, 2022 without giving any notice. The amount of Rs. 10 crores was in the account on the date of the freeze.

It was submitted that the account is debit frozen. The permission should be granted to operate the account to meet the expenses.

On the other hand advocate, Zohaib Hossain opposed the petition saying that the petitioner is the company which committed the scheduled offense. The petitioner should not be allowed to operate his bank account.

He submitted that if the permission is granted, the petitioner should be put on the term not to repatriate abroad. Secondly, the directors who were summoned will join the investigation.

(With inputs from ANI)

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

More Less

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters

* Enter a valid email

* Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Post your comment

.