Skip to content

How Reef helps shape city ghost kitchen regulations to accommodate its model

In many major cities, mobile ghost kitchens are governed by regulations designed for food trucks, which operators feel can impede business.

Delivery-focused food trailers, like those run by Reef Technology, often run afoul of existing regulations because many city laws require mobile kitchens to move every few days rather than park in one place, Mason Harrison, Reef’s head of communications, said. Local regulations can also require mobile food units to return to a central preparation facility more frequently than mobile ghost kitchen operators would like.

Such regulations are designed to keep mobile kitchens from competing with brick-and-mortar restaurants in commercial districts, while ensuring food trucks and mobile kitchens are clean and serve safely-prepared foods. Even though Reef vessels are parked on Reef’s national network of parking lots and not on city streets, they must move under these regulations — throwing a wrench in Reef’s operations, which keep vessels as stationary as possible.

Reef, however, isn’t content to follow these laws. Instead, it’s influencing major markets to write new ones.

The mobile ghost kitchen firm, which uses trailers fitted with kitchens to cook food across its parking lots, has racked up a string of high-profile permitting violations. In Houston, several Reef units shut down after inspectors found them operating without proper permitswhile in New York City, the company shuttered some of its modular kitchens in October after its permits expired. And in Florida, 58 out of 61 mobile Reef units licensed in the state had seen health violations as of December 2021, including two violations serious enough to require the temporary closure of units.

Recent developments suggest there may be problems at the company, as well. Reef temporarily suspended operations at its mobile kitchens in New York last year after its operating permits expired. In December, Chef David Chang’s Fuku axed its partnership with the company following reports that Reef vessels were regularly producing undercooked food. In May, Reef cut 5% of its global workforce. In June, Reef too reportedly pushed out its head of kitchens, Michael Beacham.

But the company is still hungry for expansion and is crafting legislation with local governments to ease its entrance to and operations in new markets.

So far, the company has worked with lawmakers and city officials in its hometown of Miami, as well as Dallas; Orlando, Florida; and Vancouver, Canada, to craft pilot programs that aid its mobile food vessels. But not every market is willing to change their laws for ghost kitchens.

“We don’t have a city of Miami in every market, [a city that is] willing to contemplate our model,” Harrison said.

A man picks up an order from a Reef vessel.  Photo by KATELYN PERRY

Optional Caption

Courtesy of Reef Technology

Miami is a blueprint for Reef’s regulation goals

Reef’s business model doesn’t fit within existing regulations in many cities, but it’s trying to change that, Michael Beacham, Reef’s former president of kitchen operations, said in October.

Prior to the pandemic, Reef did not try to gain approval from city regulators before beginning operations in new markets, said Miami city commissioner Ken Russell.

“I’ve heard of several players within this industry having an interpretation that they don’t need governmental approval to operate from private parking lots, for example,” Russell said. “And even Reef felt the same way, at least their attorneys felt the same way when they were first coming into town.”

The process of co-creating new market regulations can be as simple as meeting with city staff to explain what variances Reef needs to run its mobile food operations, Harrison said. In Dallas, for example, mobile food units were legally required to return to commissary kitchens every day, according to documents from the city’s code compliance department, which was disruptive for business.

In Miami, Reef’s business model was not compliant with existing regulations early in the company’s operations, according to Russell.

“They were considered noncompliant because our ordinance is specific to food trucks. And it has a provision where they have to keep moving every couple of days,” Russell said.