After Orlando Brown signed with the Cincinnati Bengalsthe idea went around in places such as Twitter that he took a big loss compared to an extension offer from the Kansas City Chiefs he turned down.
That extension Brown left on the table with the Chiefs was reported as a six-year deal worth $139 million.
With the Bengals, he signed a deal worth $64 million over four years with an immediate $31 million signing bonus.
At face value, that obviously looks like a big disparity. But things are never so simple at face value and especially when it comes to NFL contracts.
Spotrac provided some insight:
Over the span of 2022-24, when including a tag, Brown makes more money with the Bengals than he would have with the Chiefs. Only the first three of six years with the Chiefs were guaranteed anyway. After roughly two seasons with the Bengals, he enters prime extension territory again or eventually hits free agency — before turning 30, netting him one more big payday.
As other players have shown recently, a shorter deal can be much more lucrative than a long-term one. Brown is the latest example and overreactions about his contract situation were a tad premature.
More Latest News!
Bengals send Lou Anarumo to USC pro day
Bengals comment on losing Perine, Hurst and Bell in free agency
Bengals nab one of this year’s most interesting weapons in Mel Kiper’s new mock
Story originally appeared on Bengals Wire