Skip to content

England’s club vs country row is frustrating my World Cup plans

Sarina Wiegman, England Women's Head Coach, speaks during the World Cup Squad Announcement on May 31, 2023 - Getty Images/Morgan Harlow
Sarina Wiegman, England Women’s Head Coach, speaks during the World Cup Squad Announcement on May 31, 2023 – Getty Images/Morgan Harlow

Sarina Wiegman says she is frustrated that an ongoing row with Europe’s leading clubs is putting her World Cup preparations in major doubt.

The England head coach, who named his squad on Wednesday, wants them to meet at St George’s Park from June 19, just over a month before the tournament begins Down Under, to start their training camp.

But that is at odds with a global agreement reached in May by Fifa, the European Club Association and other stakeholders, which recommended that clubs should not release their players to their national teams before June 23.

According to multiple Telegraph Sport sources, the leading English Women’s Super League clubs and German giants Bayern Munich are unwilling to allow their players to join any national team camps before June 23, because they believe players need a longer post-season break. They feel they have already compromised significantly from the original, mandatory release date which is the start of the international window on July 10.

Wiegman is hoping the clubs can still be persuaded but while the debate goes on, England are unable to confirm whether they will be holding a farewell, warm-up friendly on home soil before they fly to Australia on July 5.

“I still hope we can negotiate,” Wiegman said, when asked about the strong stance of England midfielder Georgia Stanway’s club, Bayern Munich. “At this point it’s hard, but we’re trying to get the conversation going again.

“Of course, that’s frustrating because we have all our plans and we thought we were all set and then like a month ago, all of a sudden, things change – we didn’t expect that, it’s so late.

“I understand, it’s about the calendar. It’s really hard. It’s about players having rest, after the tournament players need to have rest.

“We already had this plan from November last year. We have our principles, we have the knowledge, we have the expertise and the experience, so we made the plan, starting on the 19th [of June]we spoke about that with the captains group, and then we spoke about it with the players.

“We are in contact with clubs now and it’s very constructive but it’s not finalized yet. When you’re in a top-sport environment, when you go to a World Cup, it’s the highest level, the highest intensity and volume, so you have to be at your highest levels.

“We also know that if you have more than two weeks’ rest, which if you start later then you have 26 days of no football, that’s not good preparation for the players and the welfare of the players wouldn’t be good, so that’s why we want to start on the 19th.

“It’s not only the physiology, it’s also the decision-making in football and getting really ready to start when we start on the 22nd [of July v Haiti] and knowing we’re going to the other side of the world, that takes a couple of days too.

“It’s two days for traveling, you can’t start training straight away because you first have to do the jet-lag, so we really need that time to get prepared, so I just hope that we keep going with the good conversations and we resolve this.”

According to sources, England are hoping to face Portugal in a friendly at Stadium MK on July 1, but no such fixture has been confirmed. Asked about any possible warm-up match, Wiegman replied: “The reason why we can’t tell [you] anything about that has to do with when we start [training].

“If we start on the 19th we have enough days to get ready for such a game, if we start later then the players are even longer out of football and then you have too short a time to get ready for a fixture. I just hope we can do that and play that fixture but I can’t say anything about that now.”

France, Germany and the Republic of Ireland are understood to be among the others who want to start training prior to June 23. Olympic champions Canada are believed to be asking for an even earlier start date of June 12, which is understood to have left clubs angry.

The ECA’s head of women’s football, Claire Bloomfield, previously described early call-ups as “a serious concern for player welfare”.

Can England win this World Cup?

By Tom Garry

Seven weeks ago, if you had asked most women’s football aficionados worldwide who they were tipping to win this summer’s World Cup, most would have mentioned England, along with the holders the United States and two-time champions Germany as the leading contenders.

But then the Lionesses saw captain Leah Williamson and Chelsea star Fran Kirby both ruled out of the tournament because of knee injuries, and with Euros Golden Boot-winner Beth Mead now also confirmed as missing the World Cup too, the outside, global perception of England’s threat will be very different.

Can England still win the World Cup without those players? Yes, it’s certainly possible, as Sarina Wiegman’s squad remains one of the strongest that will fly Down Under.

But will they win it? That now seems much more doubtful, and frankly, even reaching the latter stages would register as another big achievement in the circumstances.

It’s a fairly youthful England squad compared to most previous tournaments, with an average age of 25.7, down from 27.1 for the 2019 World Cup. There is plenty of exciting talent – ​​not least skilful stars including Lauren James, Chloe Kelly, Lauren Hemp – but there will be rival teams at these with far more major-tournament experience, particularly in view of England’s injuries.

It is not just that trio’s absences that will matter: Center-back Millie Bright has been selected, but still faces a race to be fit in time for the opening game, having been sidelined since March. And even before their injury worries mounted, the Lionesses already knew they were in the tougher half of the draw.

In the same half of the draw – which is entirely separated from the other half until the final because of the divide between teams based in Australia and teams based in New Zealand for the tournament – ​​are most of the world’s in-form sides: A strong -looking Germany side, a resurgent France with their new manager Herve Renard, co-hosts Australia and the competition’s poster star Sam Kerr, Olympic champions Canada and South American champions Brazil. Four-time winners the United States find themselves in the other half of the competition and unable to meet any of those sides prior to the final.

The Lionesses reached the semi-finals at each of the past two World Cups. Another run to the semi-finals should not be sniffed at. In order to achieve that – if they both win their groups and tough-looking last-16 games – England would have to get past Germany in a blockbuster quarter-final, as they are on a collision course for a last-eight meeting in Sydney. To get past a tie like that will require a performance for the ages.

Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month, then enjoy 1 year for just $9 with our US-exclusive offer.